qt-qml-review¶
When to use
Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 QML code -- or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (47+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering bindings, layout, loaders, delegates, states, and performance. Optionally invokes system qmllint for type-level checks. Reports only high-confidence issues (>80/100) with structured mitigations. Read-only -- never modifies code.
Source: skills/qt-qml-review/SKILL.md
| compatibility | Designed for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and similar agents. |
| license | LicenseRef-Qt-Commercial OR BSD-3-Clause |
| category | review |
| qt-version | 6.x |
| version | 1.0 |
Qt QML Code Review¶
A structured, read-only code review skill for Qt6 QML code that combines deterministic linting with parallel agent-driven deep analysis across six focused domains.
When to use this skill¶
- When the user mentions review-related tasks: "review", "check", "audit", "look over", "code review", "sanity check"
- Suggest running this skill before committing QML code
- When the user asks to validate Qt6 QML code quality
Scope detection¶
Detect the user's intended scope from their language:
Diff/commit scope (narrow)¶
Triggered by language like: "this commit", "these changes", "the diff", "what I changed", "my changes", "staged changes", "outstanding changes", "before I commit"
Action: Run git diff (unstaged) and git diff --cached
(staged) to obtain the changeset. If the user says "this commit",
use git diff HEAD~1..HEAD. Review only the changed lines plus
sufficient surrounding context (±50 lines) for understanding.
Only report issues found in the changed lines -- do not report
issues in unchanged surrounding context.
Codebase scope (wide)¶
Triggered by language like: "review the codebase", "audit the project", "check the repository", "review src/", or when a specific file/directory path is given without commit language.
Action: Glob for *.qml files in the specified scope. Review
all matched files.
Execution order¶
The review proceeds in three phases. Never skip a phase.
Phase 1: Deterministic linting (Python script)¶
Run the unified Python linter against the target files. Requires Python 3.6+ (no external dependencies). If Python is not available, warn the user and skip to Phase 1b.
python3 references/lint-scripts/qt_qml_lint.py <files...>
# If python3 is not found, fall back to:
python references/lint-scripts/qt_qml_lint.py <files...>
This single-pass scanner encodes all mechanically-checkable rules from the QML review checklist. It reads each file once and evaluates all rules per line, plus block-level structural checks. Output is deterministic and repeatable. The linter is authoritative -- do not second-guess its output.
Collect all output before proceeding.
Rule categories (47+ checks): - IMP (Imports) -- ordering, versioning, redundancy, deprecation - ORD (Ordering) -- QML attribute ordering convention - BND (Bindings) -- property var, imperative =, Qt.binding style - LAY (Layout) -- anchors/Layout mixing, sizing in layouts - LDR (Loader) -- status guards, createComponent, createQmlObject - DEL (Delegates) -- required properties, reuse safety, connect() - STA (States) -- PropertyChanges syntax, transitions, StateGroup - IMG (Images) -- sourceSize, asynchronous loading - PRF (Performance) -- transparent rect, opacity, clip, layer - STY (Style) -- id:root, camelCase, group notation - SIG (Signals) -- Connections target, handler syntax - ERR (Error/Security) -- hardcoded http://, non-portable paths - JS (JavaScript) -- var/let/const, loose equality
Phase 1b: System qmllint (optional)¶
Attempt to run qmllint if available on the system. Detection
order:
$QT_HOST_PATH/bin/qmllintwhich qmllint/where qmllint- Skip if not found (warn user)
If found, run with JSON output:
Parse the JSON output and merge with Python linter findings. Deduplicate by file+line+issue. qmllint is authoritative for type- level checks (unresolved types, incompatible assignments, alias cycles). The Python linter is authoritative for style, ordering, and performance patterns that qmllint does not cover.
Phase 2: Agent-driven deep analysis (6 parallel agents)¶
Launch six focused review agents in parallel. Name each agent descriptively when launching (e.g. "Agent 1: Bindings & Properties") to provide progress visibility. Each agent has a tight scope and a specific checklist. Agents are READ-ONLY -- they must never edit or write files.
Tool-agnostic agent contract: Each agent described below is a self-contained review mission. In Claude Code, launch them as general-purpose subagents. In other tools, implement each as whatever subprocess, prompt chain, or analysis pass the tool supports. The key requirement is that each agent: - Has read access to all source files in scope - Can search/grep the codebase to trace symbols - Reports findings in the structured format below - Applies confidence thresholds: >80 = confirmed finding, 60-79 = investigation target (max 10 total across all agents), <60 = suppress - Does NOT duplicate findings from Phase 1 lint output (pass lint output as context to each agent)
See Agent missions below for the six agents.
Phase 3: Consolidation and reporting¶
Merge lint script output, qmllint output (if available), and all agent findings. Deduplicate (same file+line+issue = one finding). Apply confidence scoring. Format the final report using the output format below.
Agent missions¶
Launch all six agents in parallel. Pass each agent: 1. The list of files in scope 2. The Phase 1 lint output (so they skip already-flagged issues) 3. The Phase 1b qmllint output if available 4. Their specific mission below
Each agent should read all files in scope, then focus on its assigned categories.
Agent 1: Bindings & Properties¶
Scope: Binding correctness, property types, alias chains, qualified lookup, binding loops.
Check for:
- Multi-cycle binding loops (A changes B via handler, B's binding
updates A) -- runtime only detects single-cycle
- Property alias chains (alias to alias) where intermediate
components may not be initialized
- Unqualified property access (bare someProperty instead of
root.someProperty) -- complements qmllint unqualified warning
with semantic context
- Qt.binding() closures capturing loop variables by reference
(use let not var)
- pragma ComponentBehavior: Bound missing on files with delegates
that access outer-scope ids
- Missing readonly on properties that are bound but never
imperatively assigned
References: references/qt-qml-review-checklist.md
sections 3 (Bindings & Properties)
Agent 2: Layout & Anchoring¶
Scope: Anchoring correctness, layout sizing, visual tree structure.
Check for:
- Anchoring to items with visible: false (resolve the target id,
check its visible property)
- Anchoring across unrelated visual tree branches (not sharing a
common parent)
- Items in Layouts using implicitWidth/implicitHeight bindings
that could create feedback loops
- Missing Layout.fillWidth/Layout.fillHeight on items that
should stretch
- Nested Layouts without clear sizing policy (ambiguous size
negotiation)
References: references/qt-qml-review-checklist.md
section 4 (Layout & Anchoring)
Agent 3: Component Loading & Lifecycle¶
Scope: Loader patterns, dynamic object creation, Connections lifecycle, C++ integration.
Check for:
- Component.createObject() return values not tracked or destroyed
(memory leak)
- Loader switching between source and sourceComponent at runtime
(unsupported)
- Image with dynamic/network source missing Image.status error
handling
- Connections with dynamically-changing target not handling
null target state
- Context properties (rootContext()->setContextProperty()) in C++
integration code
- Object ownership issues at QML/C++ boundary (parentless objects
returned from invokable functions)
References: references/qt-qml-review-checklist.md
sections 5 (Loader), 8 (Images), 13 (C++ Integration)
Agent 4: ListView & Delegate Correctness¶
Scope: Model-view patterns, delegate lifecycle, reuse safety, required properties.
Check for:
- Missing required property int index when index is used in a
delegate that declares other required properties
- Delegate accessing model.roleName for roles not defined in the
model's roleNames()
- Complex delegates (nested Repeaters, multiple Loaders, heavy
bindings) that will degrade scroll performance
- currentIndex usage without guards for known Qt bugs
(QTBUG-48633, QTBUG-93293)
- DelegateChooser patterns that could fail on non-QAbstractItemModel
(choice made once at creation, not re-evaluated)
- Pooled delegates remaining visible (missing
onPooled: visible = false pattern)
References: references/qt-qml-review-checklist.md
section 6 (ListView & Delegates)
Agent 5: States, Transitions & Structure¶
Scope: State machine correctness, migration patterns, component structure.
Check for:
- PropertyChanges.restoreEntryValues surprises (properties
reverting on state exit when developer expects them to persist)
- Binding.restoreMode mismatch from Qt 5 migration (default
changed from RestoreNone to RestoreBindingOrValue)
- Deprecated Connections handler syntax (onFoo:) vs
modern function onFoo() in migrated code
- QtGraphicalEffects imports that should be migrated to
MultiEffect (Qt 6.5+)
- Top-level component states that should use StateGroup for
reusability
- Missing from/to on transitions that could fire unexpectedly
when new states are added
References: references/qt-qml-review-checklist.md
sections 7 (States), 14 (Migration)
Agent 6: Performance & Code Quality¶
Scope: Performance anti-patterns, rendering cost, JavaScript quality, style consistency.
Check for:
- Expensive expressions in property bindings (function calls that
should be cached as readonly property)
- QRegularExpression or complex computation inside loops
- Missing Text.PlainText when rich text is not needed (default
textFormat incurs parsing overhead)
- font.preferShaping: false opportunity (when text shaping
features are unused)
- Signals that communicate down (should be functions) or functions
that communicate up (should be signals)
- Unnecessary id assignments on objects never referenced
- Custom properties scattered across items instead of consolidated
in QtObject { id: privates }
- Singletons used for data (should use property injection for
testability)
- Pointer handler opportunities (MouseArea that should be
TapHandler/DragHandler for multi-touch)
- Reusable components with explicit width/height instead of
implicitWidth/implicitHeight (prevents consumer resizing)
- parent used without null-check in delegates or Loader items
(can be null during creation/destruction)
- Missing pragma ComponentBehavior: Bound on files with delegates
that access outer-scope ids
References: references/qt-qml-review-checklist.md
sections 9 (Performance), 10 (Style), 11 (Signals),
12 (JavaScript), 13 (C++ Integration)
Confidence scoring guidelines¶
| Confidence | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | Certain: direct rule violation with full trace | Report as finding |
| 80-89 | High: rule violation confirmed but edge case possible | Report as finding |
| 60-79 | Medium: likely issue but cannot fully verify | Report as investigation target |
| <60 | Low: suspicion only | Suppress entirely |
Investigation targets are findings the agent believes are real but cannot fully verify. These are presented in a separate section for human verification. Maximum 10 investigation targets per report, prioritized by confidence within the 60-79 band.
Output format¶
Present the final report as follows. Use exactly this structure.
## QML Code Review Report
**Scope**: [diff: `git diff HEAD~1..HEAD` | files: <paths>]
**Files reviewed**: N
**Issues found**: N (M from lint, K from deep analysis)
**qmllint**: [ran / not available]
---
### Lint findings
For each lint finding:
#### [L-NNN] <Short title>
- **File**: `path/to/file.qml:42`
- **Rule**: <rule ID from checklist>
- **Finding**: <what the script detected>
- **Mitigation**: <what to do, in prose -- no code patches>
---
### Deep analysis findings
For each agent finding:
#### [D-NNN] <Short title>
- **File**: `path/to/file.qml:42`
- **Category**: <agent name: Bindings & Properties | Layout &
Anchoring | Component Loading & Lifecycle | ListView &
Delegates | States & Structure | Performance & Quality>
- **Confidence**: NN/100
- **Finding**: <description of the issue>
- **Trace**: <how the issue was confirmed -- which symbols were
followed, what was checked>
- **Mitigation**: <what to do, in prose -- no code patches>
---
### Investigation targets (human verification needed)
Findings the agent identified but could not fully verify.
Maximum 10, sorted by confidence. These require human judgment.
For each investigation target:
#### [I-NNN] <Short title>
- **File**: `path/to/file.qml:42`
- **Category**: <agent name>
- **Confidence**: NN/100
- **Finding**: <what the agent suspects>
- **Unverified because**: <what the agent could not confirm>
- **How to verify**: <specific action for the reviewer>
---
### Summary
| Category | Lint | Deep | Investigate | Total |
|----------|------|------|-------------|-------|
| ... | N | N | N | N |
| **Total**| **M**| **K**| **I** | **N** |
Findings below confidence 60 are suppressed entirely.
References¶
The following reference files contain detailed checklists:
references/qt-qml-review-checklist.md-- Complete QML review rules (lint + agent rules, always loaded)references/lint-scripts/qt_qml_lint.py-- Single-pass Python linter (runs all 47+ checks in <1s)
Copyright (C) 2026 The Qt Company.